Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Fontaine, Phm's avatar

I am delayed in asking...needed to find my 'summary question'. If my information is not correct please clarify, thank you.

Given the sad state of likely global immunizations, specifically measles I have read the passive immunity from mom to newborn is not very good... convention being "protective" maternal antibodies are present ~ 9+ months post birth. However, titres are minimal within a couple months. I find it counterintuitive, what I read indicated mom's with natural immunity may offer their new born a shorter window of passive antibodies cf those who were vaccinated with MMR.

This may be simply an academic exercise yet there is a vast number of newborns who are especially vulnerable to contracting measles & no fault or lack of due diligence on the part of their mothers.

I am also aware MMR vaccine effectiveness with early vaccination is lower than with vaccination at 14 mo's ( ~76% at 6 mo's, rising to 95% at 9 months) with permanently reduced antibody titers at a later age, even after follow-up vaccination(s). These effects are greatest when vaccinated at 6 months of age and decrease as vaccination occurs at a later age. In addition, to those who receive the MMR prior to the established timing for their 1st dose, any previous dosage is MMR0.

Clearly, we cannot vaccinated pregnant women but we could discuss a 'booster dose' of MMR such as the recommended RSV (late 2nd or early 3rd trimester), as such off-label.

OMG the tragic consequences of a newborn contracting measles.

Appreciatly your, JJF Phm 🇨🇦

John Fontaine, Phm's avatar

Respectfully, Dr. Bernard I am aware of what you outlined & apology for not be clearer in my question or concern for what I believe is the majority of not a large percentage of newborns are susceptible to contracting measles.

The conventionsl paradigm being babies born to mother's who have developed measles antibodies from natural exposure or vaccination are protected throughout their initial "12 months" is flawed if I understand correctly from what I have read.

These passive antibodies wane significantly during the initial post partum period such that their is limited protection after 3-6 months.

If my understanding is correct (stand corrected) newborns would have little to no competing maternal antibodies post 6 months from delivery. Once again if this has been established should we not be evaluating when the recommended 1st dose of MMR should be offered/administered. This would then not be considered MMR0.

Appreciatively yours,

John

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?